PoC, MVR, or Prototype: Understanding the Difference

Anastasiia Kanarska
By Anastasiia Kanarska,
15th August |
13
Understanding the difference between PoC, prototype, and MVP

Any successful software product starts with an idea that goes through numerous phases until transformed into a ready-to-market solution. It seems straightforward – you just need a team of skillful developers to bring what you have on your mind to life. But why do so many projects fail? How to avoid expensive errors and build a commercially successful software solution?

There are many crucial factors to take into consideration including thorough testing during product development. Before you rush into full product development you need to be sure it’s worth your investments. This is why the journey always starts with idea validation through a PoC, MVP, or prototype. 

These are the most common approaches to test concepts that make a solid foundation for any successful software product. Each one has its peculiarities and fits best in a particular case. 

In this article, we will delve into the specifics and key differences between a PoC, MVP, and prototype and explain how to choose the right strategy that will maximize your efforts.  

What is a PoC?

A Proof of Concept (PoC) is a small, targeted project aimed at testing whether the idea is feasible and practical to build. It focuses on assessing key hypotheses or showcasing specific features or capabilities in order to continue with the development and get investments. PoC is used for internal purposes so its scope of focus is limited – it neglects UI, security, and development best practices. The code is not reused at later development stages. 

By conducting a PoC, teams can identify potential challenges and assess whether the proposed solution can meet the project’s requirements.

Benefits:

  • First idea validation
  • Giving confidence to stakeholders by proving the value
  • Early identification of potential risks
  • Preventing money loss

Best practices:

  • Set clear expectations from the testing
  • Conduct a pinpointed validation by narrowing the scope
  • Gather a team of skillful and experienced specialists
  • Create a comprehensive documentation during the testing stage
  • Collect and analyze feedback from stakeholders and investors 

What is an MVP?

A Minimum Viable Product (MVP) is a releasable version of a product that includes only the core features necessary to satisfy early users and gather valuable feedback. It’s a product that has just enough functionality to be usable and provide insights for future iterations.

Building an MVP is a strategic move that focuses on validating the idea in the market with minimal resources and investment. This allows for analyzing early adopters’ interactions, gathering meaningful feedback, measuring engagement, and understanding your target audience better, their expectations, and what they like or dislike about your product. 

With this approach, you develop incrementally and respond to users’ needs and pain points effectively in every subsequent release.

Key characteristics: 

  • Core functionality
  • Focus on early adopters
  • Clear value proposition
  • Iterative process

Benefits:

  • Faster time to market
  • User feedback
  • Flexibility for iteration
  • Attracting early adopters
  • Proof of market demand
  • Minimal resources and investments

What is a prototype?

A prototype is a preliminary model or mock-up of a product used to visualize ideas and concepts. It’s a tangible representation of how the final product might look and function, allowing teams to explore different design and functionality options before full development.

Prototyping allows for filling the gaps in the initial concept and refining it based on feedback so that the final outcome meets business needs and user expectations. 

Prototyping comes in a few common models:

  • Rapid prototyping is used to quickly test specific features, search for ideas, and collect instant insights. This model has a narrow focus and isn’t typically reused later.
  • Evolutionary prototyping involves an iterative process of refining and developing prototypes over time, eventually evolving into the final product. Unlike throwaway prototypes, which are discarded after use, an evolutionary prototype is incrementally improved and expanded based on user feedback and changing requirements until it becomes the complete, final version of the product. 
  • Incremental prototyping requires breaking down the final product into several small prototypes developed and refined individually and then merged into a full solution. 
  • Extreme prototyping is an approach primarily used in web development, where the process is divided into three distinct phases. It’s a rapid and iterative method that emphasizes creating a basic working model of the application and progressively refining it, focusing first on the UI, then on the functionality, and finally on the integration of those elements into a fully operational system.

Benefits:

  • Understanding and clarifying the project requirements
  • Early user involvement and feedback
  • Risk reduction
  • Avoiding costly mistakes
  • Iterative refinement and accommodating changes
  • Better project planning and estimation
  • Validation of concepts 

Key differences between PoC, MVP, and prototype

Though each approach is followed in order to test the concept, polish it, reduce risks, and avoid added expenses, PoC, MVP, and prototype have distinctive features that are necessary to know. 

Every approach has its unique role and purpose in the software development process. Basically, they represent different stages of a product’s lifecycle. 

The table provided below highlights the major specifics of a PoC, MVP, and prototype. 

PoC vs prototype vs MVP

When to use PoC, MVP, or prototype

PoC:

PoC is used early in the project when there’s uncertainty about the technical feasibility of an idea. A PoC is particularly valuable in terms of exploring new technologies, solving complex technical challenges, or validating innovative concepts. It helps to determine whether the idea can be implemented successfully and provides the confidence needed to move forward with development.

Prototype:

A prototype is most effective during the design phase to refine the user experience and align all stakeholders on the product vision. Prototyping allows for exploring different design options, testing user flows, and ensuring that the product will meet user needs before development begins. It’s also a valuable tool for communicating ideas and getting early buy-in from stakeholders.

MVP:

An MVP is the best way to enter the market quickly and start gathering feedback from real users. This approach is especially useful for startups and businesses looking to validate a product idea with minimal investment. By focusing on the core features that deliver the most value, an MVP enables the launching of a functional product, attracting early adopters, and learning from their interactions. This feedback is crucial for refining the product and making data-driven decisions about future development.

How to choose the right approach for your project

PoC, prototype, and MVP aren’t interchangeable approaches – they are critical elements of different stages of the product development cycle. Focus on your current needs and objectives to understand which one is right at a particular moment. 

Answer the following questions to reach the best decision:

What are you trying to achieve?

Are you trying to validate a new technology, gather user feedback, or refine the design of your product? If your primary goal is to test technical feasibility, a PoC is the best choice. If you aim to quickly launch a product to the market and start collecting real-world feedback, then an MVP is the way to go. If your focus is on refining the user experience and visualizing the product before full development, a prototype will serve you best.

What resources are available?

Assess the time constraints, budget, and skills of your development team. A PoC typically requires fewer resources and can be developed quickly, making it suitable for projects with tight budgets or early-stage explorations. An MVP, while more resource-intensive, allows you to enter the market faster and start generating revenue or collecting user feedback. Prototyping may require a more extensive design effort but can prevent costly mistakes later by ensuring that the user experience is optimized before development begins.

Are you validating, launching, or designing?

The stage of your project is another critical factor. If you are in the early stages and need to validate a concept or technology, start with a PoC. If your project is further along and you’re ready to launch a basic version of your product, an MVP will help you get to market quickly and iteratively improve based on user feedback. If you’re in the design phase and need to refine how your product will look and feel, a prototype is essential for testing design concepts and ensuring that all stakeholders share a common vision.

End notes

Whatever you are developing, do not embark on this journey without having tested the waters first. Validate your idea to gain strong confidence in it and shape it in the right direction. This will help you mitigate risks effectively, use your resources wisely, and increase your chances for success.

PoCs, prototypes, and MVPs are all similar concepts, each guiding you toward the same goal: to test how technically viable and appealing your product will be for your users. However, each approach has its right time during the development process and specific use. Understanding when and how to apply each method is crucial to maximizing their benefits.

By knowing the key differences between PoCs, prototypes, and MVPs, you can make informed decisions that align with your project’s goals, resources, and stage of development. This knowledge empowers you to choose the approach that best fits your needs, ensuring that your product is built on a solid foundation and has the greatest potential for success.